fix(agent): dedup repetition output + mark INCOMPLETE instead of NORMAL

mateclaw-server/src/main/java/vip/mate/agent/graph/NodeStreamingChatHelper.java

@@ -302,8 +302,8 @@ public class NodeStreamingChatHelper {
      * (removed at 42d406ff for being brittle on legitimate long-form
      * content), just the cheap specific check that catches this loop.
      */
-    private static final int CONTENT_REPEAT_MIN_PERIOD = 24;
-    private static final int CONTENT_REPEAT_MAX_PERIOD = 240;
+    public static final int CONTENT_REPEAT_MIN_PERIOD = 24;
+    public static final int CONTENT_REPEAT_MAX_PERIOD = 240;
     private static final int CONTENT_REPEAT_MAX_OCCURRENCES = 4;
     /**
      * Re-scan every N chars of new content. Smaller = faster reaction,
@@ -1627,6 +1627,49 @@ public class NodeStreamingChatHelper {
         }
     }
 
+    /**
+     * Collapse a content buffer's trailing run of verbatim repeats to a
+     * single copy. Used to clean up the persisted final answer after
+     * {@link #hasRepeatingSuffix} fires — the streamed text already
+     * contains the duplicates (SSE chunks can't be unsent), but the
+     * DB-persisted message and the IM channel reply should show ONE
+     * clean copy of the looping unit, not a wall.
+     *
+     * <p>Algorithm: find the smallest period in {@code [minPeriod,
+     * maxPeriod]} where the buffer ends with that unit repeated 2+
+     * times consecutively, then return everything up to (and including)
+     * the FIRST copy of that unit. Conservative — if no period yields
+     * 2+ consecutive matches, returns the buffer unchanged.
+     *
+     * <p>Public for unit-testing alongside {@link #hasRepeatingSuffix}.
+     */
+    public static String dedupTrailingRepeats(String content, int minPeriod, int maxPeriod) {
+        if (content == null || content.isEmpty()) return content;
+        int len = content.length();
+        if (minPeriod <= 0 || maxPeriod < minPeriod) return content;
+        int periodCap = Math.min(maxPeriod, len / 2);
+        for (int p = minPeriod; p <= periodCap; p++) {
+            int unitStart = len - p;
+            // Walk backward as far as the unit keeps matching.
+            int copies = 1;
+            int blockStart = unitStart - p;
+            while (blockStart >= 0
+                    && content.regionMatches(blockStart, content, unitStart, p)) {
+                copies++;
+                blockStart -= p;
+            }
+            if (copies >= 2) {
+                // Keep prefix + ONE copy. The first copy starts at
+                // (blockStart + p) since the loop walked back one step
+                // past the last match.
+                int firstCopyStart = blockStart + p;
+                int trimEnd = firstCopyStart + p;
+                return content.substring(0, trimEnd);
+            }
+        }
+        return content;
+    }
+
     /**
      * Detect whether {@code accum} ends with the same {@code period}-sized
      * unit repeated at least {@code minOccurrences} times consecutively,

mateclaw-server/src/main/java/vip/mate/agent/graph/node/ReasoningNode.java

@@ -489,6 +489,46 @@ public class ReasoningNode implements NodeAction {
             return builder.build();
         }
 
+        if (result.partial() && "content_repetition".equals(result.errorMessage())) {
+            // Reasoning loop: the helper disposed the stream because the
+            // model emitted the same paragraph 4+ times in a row (qwen3.6
+            // / deepseek-r1 self-arguing pattern). The streamed text
+            // already showed the duplicates to the user — we can't unsend
+            // SSE chunks — but the persisted finalAnswer should be ONE
+            // clean copy so the IM channel reply and any page-reload
+            // history don't show the wall of repetition. Skip
+            // FinalAnswerNode's evidence validation: the answer is
+            // already truncated, applying validateAnswer on top would
+            // double-stamp warnings on something the user already knows
+            // is incomplete.
+            String rawContent = result.text() != null ? result.text() : "";
+            String dedupedAnswer = NodeStreamingChatHelper.dedupTrailingRepeats(
+                    rawContent,
+                    NodeStreamingChatHelper.CONTENT_REPEAT_MIN_PERIOD,
+                    NodeStreamingChatHelper.CONTENT_REPEAT_MAX_PERIOD);
+            log.warn("[ReasoningNode] Content-repetition cap hit (raw={} chars → deduped={} chars); " +
+                            "INCOMPLETE",
+                    rawContent.length(), dedupedAnswer.length());
+            var builder = reasonOutput()
+                    .needsToolCall(false)
+                    .shouldSummarize(false)
+                    .finalAnswer(dedupedAnswer.isEmpty()
+                            ? "（模型反复输出同一段内容，已自动截断。请尝试重新生成或换个问法。）"
+                            : dedupedAnswer)
+                    .llmCallCount(nextLlmCallCount)
+                    .finishReason(FinishReason.INCOMPLETE)
+                    // contentStreamed=true because the user already saw
+                    // the looping text in their bubble; persisting again
+                    // via streamedContent would replay it.
+                    .contentStreamed(true)
+                    .thinkingStreamed(result.thinking() != null && !result.thinking().isEmpty())
+                    .mergeUsage(state, result);
+            if (result.thinking() != null && !result.thinking().isEmpty()) {
+                builder.finalThinking(result.thinking());
+            }
+            return builder.build();
+        }
+
         // Fatal error：直接设置 finalAnswer 为错误文案 + ERROR_FALLBACK，
         // 不走 LimitExceededNode（后者会再发一次 LLM 调用，语义不对且对认证/配额错误会再失败）。
         // ReasoningDispatcher 看到 !needsToolCall && !shouldSummarize → finalAnswerNode，