Closes#168
The native DashScope provider exposes both chat and embedding models, but
DASHSCOPE_NATIVE_ALLOW_PREFIXES only listed chat families
(qwen-/qwen2-/qwen3-/deepseek-/baichuan/yi-/llama). When a user manually
added text-embedding-v1/v2/v3/v4 to the dashscope provider,
assertModelIdAcceptable() rejected the id because no allow prefix matched.
Add 'text-embedding-' to the allow-list and broaden the doc comment from
"native chat protocol" to "native protocol (chat or embedding)" so the
intent is clear.
Discovery probing is chat-based and will still mark embedding entries
probeOk=false; surfacing them as discoverable embedding suggestions is a
separate follow-up.
Closes#167
EmbeddingModelFactory.buildOpenAi() hard-failed on any provider whose API
key was empty or unusable, so keyless providers like Ollama and OpenCode
(declared with requireApiKey=false) could pass the chat connectivity test
but bounce when the same provider's embedding model was tested.
Mirror the chat path in OpenAiCompatibleChatModelBuilder.buildOpenAiApi:
- If requireApiKey is not explicitly false, an unusable key still throws.
- If requireApiKey == false, the key check is skipped and an empty string
is passed to OpenAiApi.builder() so no Authorization: Bearer header is
attached to the outgoing request.
Closes#166
EmbeddingModelFactory used EmbeddingProtocol.fromProviderId() to pick the
embedding protocol, which substring-matches 'dashscope' / 'qwen' / 'aliyun'
in the providerId. The dashscope-compat provider carries 'dashscope' in its
id but runs in OpenAI compatible mode (chatModel='OpenAIChatModel',
baseUrl='https://dashscope.aliyuncs.com/compatible-mode/v1'). Routing it to
DASHSCOPE_EMBEDDING made DashScopeApi build its native path against the
compat base, producing 404s on every embedding call.
Switch to the chatModel column instead — the same signal ModelProtocol
.fromChatModel() uses for the chat path. chatModel='DashScopeChatModel'
takes the native protocol; everything else (including dashscope-compat)
takes OpenAI-compatible.
EmbeddingProtocol.fromProviderId() is retained for reference but is no
longer called; future callers should follow the chatModel pattern.
Closes#162
require_mention=true previously degraded to a no-op when botPrefix was unset:
shouldProcess() returned true for all messages and checkAccess() fell through
unconditionally, so any group message would be answered — including ones where
the @mention targeted another user.
FeishuChannelAdapter now consults the Feishu SDK's mentions field directly:
- WebSocket: read EventMessage.getMentions(); webhook: read mentions[] from the
JSON payload. In both paths each mention's id.open_id is compared against the
bot's own open_id.
- Bot open_id is fetched lazily via /open-apis/bot/v3/info and cached on the
adapter instance. If the call fails the message is allowed through, matching
the previous behaviour.
- The require_mention gate is applied at the top of handleFeishuMessage so 1:1
chats are unaffected.
Tests: 15 unit cases covering null/empty inputs, bot mentioned, only-other
mentioned, bot among multiple mentions, and malformed payloads.
Register a no-op handler for the bot-added-to-chat event on the Feishu WebSocket EventDispatcher. Without it, adding the bot to a group chat raises HandlerNotFoundException and drops the long connection. Mirrors the existing reaction-event handlers. Fixes#153.
