mirror of
https://gitee.com/mateos/mateclaw.git
synced 2026-09-13 03:13:41 +08:00
af8f712986
Two related changes that align buildFallbackChain with how users actually
think about failover.
1) Source = configured providers (was: only providers with fallback_priority > 0)
Earlier the chain was strictly "providers the user explicitly opted in via
fallback_priority > 0". A healthy in-pool provider with priority=0 was
silently excluded — surprising since the pool was supposed to be the source
of truth for "what is usable". After this change:
- Candidates = every configured provider
- Pool gating = same as before (in-pool members only at build time;
runtime walker re-checks)
- Order = agent prefs (PR-3) → fallback_priority asc (>0) →
priority==0 alphabetical
So fallback_priority is now purely an ordering hint, never an exclusion.
2) Per-provider model picker = default OR first-enabled (was: default only)
Previously a provider was skipped if no chat model on it had is_default=true.
That is admin friction with no benefit — every provider had to be visited in
Settings just to mark a default before it could appear in failover. New
pickFallbackModel():
- first try getDefaultModelByProvider — user explicit pick wins
- otherwise take the first enabled chat model on the provider
- skip only if neither exists
User-visible effect on the deployment that surfaced this:
- kimi-code primary fails (401 — real auth issue, separate from this bug)
- Pool short-circuits primary → walker fires
- Walker now sees dashscope (in-pool) AND ollama (in-pool) as candidates,
even though neither has fallback_priority set
- dashscope first enabled qwen model is picked → request succeeds via
dashscope without anyone touching Settings
45 failover-related tests still green (unit-level chain-build behavior is
backward-compatible; only the candidate set and model-selection lookups
changed, both broadening the chain rather than narrowing it).
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| src | ||
| Dockerfile | ||
| pom.xml | ||